Farrar's response to Marshall on vaccine conspiracy theories

Mike Marshall’s opinion letter last week was directed at me regarding “vaccine conspiracies.”

He started by referencing “flat-earth theories,” “Israeli space lasers,” “windmills causing cancer,” “microchips in vaccines,” etc. Was Marshall implying that what I have written is in the same category as evil windmill theories?

Marshall wrote, “What you won’t see backing [the theories] up are hard facts. What you won’t see is a citation to a study or straight factual report that documents and backs up the assumption in the theory. No supporting evidence.”

Marshall, here are the “citations to the studies,” the “straight factual reports” and “supporting evidence,” of what I have written. All but one of these are references to peer-reviewed scientific publications in respected journals except for number 2, a direct admission from the CDC director that the CDC was wrong about the vaccines preventing virus transmission.

I wrote about the absence of airway immunity following vaccination and the failure of the vaccines to prevent virus transmission.

References both followed previous reports: 1. Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection December 2021; 2. CNN interview with Director of CDC Rochelle Walensky Aug. 8, 2021

I wrote about natural immunity being superior to vaccine immunity. References: 3. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports Aug. 6, 2021, Kentucky clinical trial; 4. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports Jan. 19, 2022, California/New York clinical trial.

I wrote about the virus and vaccine RNA being converted into COVID DNA and entering the nucleus of the affected cell risking alteration of the human genome. References: 5. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Vol. 118, No. 21, May 6, 2021; 6. Journal of Molecular Biology Vol. 44, No. 3, Feb. 25, 2022

The conclusions reached by the research reports in all three of these subjects were initially labeled “misinformation” and “conspiracy theories” by the CDC/FDA. Today, the first two subjects (vaccines do not prevent transmission and natural immunity superior to vaccine immunity) are reluctantly accepted as truth. Despite the data on the third subject (conversion of vaccine RNA into viral DNA) these reports remain “misinformation” and “conspiracy theory.”

The lesson: If scientists publish results that are counter to the CDC/FDA “accepted narrative” those results will be branded “misinformation” and the scientists will be “conspiracy theorists.” That is not how we make progress in scientific understanding.

In a recent response to Marshall, I presented what the CDC data base (VAERS) reports as adverse events and deaths “associated” with vaccine administration. I acknowledged that none have been confirmed by the CDC (no explanation why) but the numbers are huge. VAERS has been used by the CDC as a “first alert” system (Reference, CDC Website) but has been ignored during this epidemic (my opinion). However, VAERS must be of some significance as it was merged with Pfizer’s own list of vaccine adverse events and, under court order, made public by the FDA. Key “BNT 162b2 5.3.6” for this document.

Note the list of 1,300 different specific adverse events at the end of the document as part of the first tranche of 55,000 adverse events (approx. 350,000 to follow).

Judge for yourself.