Some of my Wilderness-friendly friends are bent out of shape because politicians want to release Montana Wilderness Study Areas (WSA) of that status, envisioning instant clearcuts and oil fields. Concern has been expressed that the action is being done without public involvement.
These areas would then be managed in compliance with the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and the National Forest Management Act. Anyone who has followed or been involved in National Forest planning know any great changes won’t happen overnight.
Some are adamant about allowing bicycles in classified wilderness -- they would have the opportunity to make their case to feature bicycle trail use. People wanting backcountry recreation would be able to have that while allowing land managers to be more efficient. Even motor heads would be allowed to have their place at the table for sharing the land.
During these times of collaboration between various user groups, these lands are very likely to become improved for wildlife, fisheries, clean water, outdoor recreation and other resource values -- all those things wanted by wildland advocates. Yes, it may mean more road access and some economic benefit to the communities.
Rather than squabbling and crying over spilt milk of the politically changed status of WSA lands, various interest groups need to play nice, put their ear to the ground and nose-to-the-grindstone to help local land managers, serve people and care for the land to benefit the public.
Reader Comments(0)